A Multi-Choice Dilemma
I
have not yet understood whether the life is objective type question or
subjective type. I have faced so many exams and at least on this matter the
examiner is always clear. But Life’s role as an examiner is tortuous. You never
know what you have to become on career path and which kind of wife you will
get, how your child will be appeased and how friends will find you more
interesting. You never know.
Whether
you should mould the stream of general life in public or whether you have to be
moulded by them, whether to opt for give and take or to do nothing. Oh, it
looks like a multi-choice question. Nice. If anything is multi-choice,
probability of my success shoots up. It’s not because I know how to choose the
best answer, it’s because I know how to throw away the bad options and then the
last one becomes automatically my answer. But what will you do if no option
remains after the throwing away process.
Being
subjective is more difficult. pronouncing more accurately, being subjective is faultier.
It’s always judgemental. You propound your idea and then go on prove it with your
never-perfect tools. The data you gather is never impartially mixed and the
sample size is well below the minimum level of 30 and the statistical errors
are much more than 5%. Every yardstick you break but even after that you think
your judgement is immaculate.
Being
a multi-choicer is easy. But what will you do if all the choices are like
candidates of General Elections. You know well that even The Supreme Court took
cognizance of it and passed order that there should be an option to not to
choose. This instance is itself enough to show the defect of multi-choice
ideology. Multi-choice is always much, much more limited than an open sky
choice i.e. Subjective Type Question. You can answer in a way you like. You
have not only to choose among A, B, C or D.
One
topic of debate is invariably popular among at least preparers of MBA entrances
and even the Coaching Institutes allow this debate to happen in a formal Group Discussion.
Yes, I know debate and GD are different but my statement is a truth. And the
topic of the above-mentioned debate is,”Whether a person should go for a love
marriage or for an arranged one?” Needless to mention the result of discussion,
you have rightly guessed it. You know
well that arranged marriage is like a Subjective-type question and love
marriage is like a Multi-choice question with innumerable options. In an
arranged marriage, you can only think after it happens and you are required to
be judgemental. And of course, your
answer must be positive otherwise you are a bad judge. Whereas in love
marriages you always think about options. The options are so much that you
often grow old before you settle down and again needless to say why, you settle
down being a Subjective-type answerer. Because you can’t be a multi-choicer
even after marriage, So, at least on this issue, Subjective-type method wins.
Life
of a person is the biggest double-dealer I have found so far. And the problem with
the person suffering from life is that he can not play turn-coat every time and
again. It starts giving you myriads of choices initially and when you are enjoying
your cosy comfort, you find yourself with no option.
You
study day and night for years with an aim to get a good job which you have
thought best for you and when you get it you discover that you have to give
much more than you receive there. Now you have no choice because you have
deliberately made yourself tailor-made for it only. And after some years you
can’t fit anywhere else but only here.
Suppose you enter a restaurant cherishing a sweet
will of making a choice between tea and coffee. And yes, there is really an
option for that, but once your order process is irrevocably complete, you come
to know that there is no provision of sugar-cubes there and the cook is too
liberal in mixing sugar. You cover up your face with your palms and say, “Alas,
save me from this multi-choice”.
[Please suggest improvement]
Posted on https://www.facebook.com/notes/hemant-das/a-multi-choice-dilemma/10151742610573106 on 13.10.2013